Page 10 - DIY Investor Magazine | Issue 39
P. 10

 Nov 2023 10
DIY Investor Magazine ·
IBT has delivered superior returns with lower volatility than the wider Alice Rigby
    This year has seen big changes for International Biotechnology Trust (IBT) since SV Health Investors served notice on their agreement to manage the trust. IBT’s Board have appointed Schroders to take on management of the trust later this year – and, crucially, the trust’s existing management team, Ailsa Craig and Marek Poszepczynski, will be moving to Schroders to continue managing the trust.
While this means it has been all change behind the scenes, when it comes to the trust’s investment process, the song remains the same. One of the most distinguishing factors of this process is Ailsa and Marek’s focus on delivering NAV growth with relatively limited volatility, in a sector otherwise noted for this specific trait.
Their approach to this challenge is exemplified by their recent investment activity. The first pillar of the team’s approach is a keen understanding of the biotechnology sector’s investment cycle, which can vary markedly from that of markets more broadly.
The last few years have demonstrated this perfectly, with the Covid-19 pandemic providing an understandable boon to the sector as vaccine efficacy became a cornerstone of public policy, with even the smallest biotechnology stocks seeing their valuations escalating in 2021.
Rising inflation in the post-pandemic period put paid to this, with the sector especially punished. Ailsa and Marek can adjust the weighting of larger, more stable but slower growth companies versus smaller, higher risk but faster growing companies in the portfolio in anticipation of these sort of market trends.
Nonetheless, as Ailsa pointed out in our recent podcast episode, she and Marek believe some strong signs of recovery are coming through.
These include secondary offerings performing well, with high quality businesses able to raise money and an increase in mergers and acquisition activity in the sector. Conversely, the team do not consider the failure of some smaller listed companies as necessarily being a negative signal, instead arguing that poorer quality companies leaving the market is a good thing for the health of the sector as a whole.
The second pillar of the team’s approach is to avoid concentrating too singularly on particular opportunities. In practice, in 2023 this has meant that while they have tilted
the portfolio further into small and mid-caps as the recovery continues, they have avoided going head first into large positions in single opportunities by grouping positions into “baskets”. This means spreading the risk by using their scientific backgrounds to select a few companies that are working on technologies to tackle the same challenge.
This leaves them less exposed to the binary outcomes often associated with biotechnology, while still taking advantage of new technologies that are transforming the industry.
Of course, binary outcomes are another hallmark of the biotechnology sector and constitute the third pillar of Ailsa and Marek’s risk management approach. Or rather, they opt to avoid binary events as much as possible.

   8   9   10   11   12